Park Chan-wook is
kind of like Quentin Tarantino. I noticed some elements in this film that I saw
in the Hateful Eight, but The Handmaiden was so much better. Park's violence is
not as gratuitous as Tarantino's, but there were certainly some over the top
scenes. He does have a lot of nudity in this film, but it is mostly necessary
to the plot, save for the final scene which is purely gratuitous as the movie
had already finished. The weird thing is I usually don't like Tarantino, but I
loved this movie. It was a more tasteful and less comic than Taratino's recent
work in the way that his recent films don't compare to Pulp Fiction.
Park cleverly
transposed the source material from Victorian England to colonial Korea, making
the story his own. The style is apparent from the very beginning. There are
some gorgeous shots. I particularly loved the design of the mansion that is
half-Western, half-Japanese, and fully Korean undergoing westernization and
Japanese imperialism. It has that creepy
feeling that Victorian homes have, while it also retains the openness of a
Japanese courtyard. The costumes also take inspiration from two worlds. The
design and cinematography is just so beautiful, as are all the actors.
The film unravels in
parts, with new twists being revealed by rewatching the story from different
points of view. It is a clever way to tell a story and it keeps the viewer
guessing what the next twist will be. The Hateful Eight was also like that, but
with just three main characters this was a little more manageable.
I did notice an
interesting translation. The French title Mademoiselle
retains the original meaning of the Korean title Agassi,
in reference to the lady. However, the English title refers to the lady's maid.
The English title leads us to believe that the maid is the protagonist, and she
is for part one. But the story evolves and Agassi takes center stage too. Why
the change? I'm not so sure. I am very glad I got to see this one in the
palace. It was my first film in the main competition and it didn’t disappoint.
No comments:
Post a Comment