A prime example of film noir, Double Indemnity does a lot of interesting things with light. Film
noir is often characterized by a dimly lit visual style. This fosters a claustrophobic
atmosphere. And this claustrophobia is represented by Phyllis Dietrichson, who
talks about being trapped in her marriage by her husband. She is visually
trapped by the shadows cast by the venetian blinds. The shadows are reminiscent
of prison bars, appropriate for a pair of criminals like Phyllis and Neff. The venetian
blind shadows cleverly allow the viewer to see half of the frame in light,
while mysteriously obscuring the other half.
The scenes
are sometimes so dark that it is sometimes hard to make out the figures. At the
same time, it is so dark that when there is a small ray of light, the contrast
is highly accentuated. When Neff enters Phyllis’s dark house (she just turned
off all the lamps), you see his shadow come through the door before you see
him. You see an ominous cutout of a man in a hat. It is a classic conservative look
for a respectable company man. Compare Neff to the femme fatale. In Phyllis’s
first scene, there is a bright aura about her—from her platinum blonde hair to
her white towel and her fair skin, she glows beneath the dark archway. Perhaps
the lighting is deceptive. Neff is struck by her beauty and her light,
permitting her to seduce Neff into a compromising situation.
The film
has a feel of doom-and-gloom, thanks to the dark lighting and the unbalanced
composition. This tone of the film contributes to the fatalistic attitude of
the characters, whose fates are predetermined. The metaphorical trolley is
headed towards the cemetery and Phyllis and Neff cannot escape this fate. In a
brilliant directorial decision, Neff narrates the story in a series of confessional
flashbacks. These events already happened and there is no changing the past.
The story begins at the edge of the cemetery and it is already too late to turn
back because the damage is done.
No comments:
Post a Comment