The Curse (2022-3)

Nathan Fielder's first scripted project defies description. Sure, Nathan For You and  The Rehearsal also fit that category, but The Curse takes cringe comedy to another level. And I wouldn't necessarily say I outright enjoyed it the way I did The Rehearsal or Nathan For You. I genuinely laughed at episodes 5 and 9. But I found myself totally baffled by most episodes, and made awkwardly uncomfortable by some. Yes, I understand that's the point but this was even much for me. The finale is the craziest hour of television ever.--opening with a spot-on recreation of a Rachael Ray segment. It was totally unpredictable, very difficult to interpret, and I have no idea how they managed to film those scenes. I have now read many an article deconstructing the finale and it's still beyond me. Fielder plays his signature deadpan self, the butt of many self-deprecating jokes. Benny Safdie is also a master of uncomfortable filmmaking, known for high anxiety movies like Good Time and Uncut Gems. As an actor, he plays out of his usual character as a sleazy reality show director--nothing like the wholesome dad or physicist he played last year. And most notably is Emma Stone, who can literally play anything. She has never been better.

The Favourite (2018)

The Favourite is raucously brilliant. The writing is hilarious and it's even more amazing for being a true story. And I am willing to overlook the abrupt and unsatisfactory ending because I so enjoyed the rest of it. Yorgos Lanthimos really has some original, quirky ideas. I also quite enjoyed the premise of the Lobster, but it's another one where I didn't like the ending. He can't finish. In this case, maybe it's actually that I just didn't want it to end. It's a really good time. The actors are all superb, not just the trio of ladies but Nicholas Hoult too. The way they deliver their lines are almost Shakespearean. The moments pass so quickly and effortlessly that it's easy to miss the punchline if you're not paying attention. It's a masterclass in acting. The cinematography is certainly a choice. For some shots, but not all, they employ a wide angled fish-eye lens. It intentionally distorts the image and makes the subjects appear small in these grand rooms. I personally didn't like the cinematography, but it is certainly notable. The costumes and production design are delightful!

Battle of the Sexes (2017)

This is a fun movie about a sport I love and an iconic American. The importance of Billie Jean King transcends sport (and she is arguably the one of the most important athletes of the 20th century). Her story is interesting, daring and entertaining. The Battle of the Sexes was obviously a big and important event, but the US Open awarded equal prize money the same year to the men's and women's tournaments apparently outside of that context and it would have been useful to include that more directly. A little less of their personal lives would have been fine too. It was kind of long, otherwise they could have included more tennis politics. The movie is quite funny and it boasts a big cast of comedians, even in small roles like Fred Armisen, who has a couple lines and then sits quietly.

La La Land (2016)

La La Land is exactly the masterpiece I hoped it would be. I have been waiting to see this film ever since they announced casting of Emma Stone and Ryan Gosling for a jazz musical (two things I love) directed by Damien Chazelle, hot off of Whiplash. He is perhaps our finest young director today. It did not disappoint; it was so beautiful. How do you know you're watching something special? I literally had goosebumps, and there were moments in the film that just brushed over me. It's when you can physically feel the euphoria take your breath away. Only film and classical music do that to me.

Let's start with the plot. It's simple but it's classic a la Golden Age Hollywood. I have to admit, their first encounter in the restaurant tricked me. It was the seen that we're fooled into thinking we knew already from the trailer, but it's not that scene. At first you're taken aback, but then you understand that their courtship is a little more complex than that. Amidst the dream-like sequences, the plot and dialogue is actually extremely realistic. The dialogue is perfectly natural. The movie is so emotionally affecting because it is so well written.

This is a contemporary musical nostalgic for a time gone by. That theme is played out through Seb's infatuation with traditional jazz. It makes a plethora of references to the classic musicals of yore, but it looks forward. It includes the requisite pas de deux, and the big numbers, and the recurring musical themes. It moves towards a wistful ending, not necessarily the happy one you expect from old Hollywood (the ending actually sort of coincidentally reminded me of Once). This movie has depth the way song-and-dance used to be able to get away without.

Chazelle's love letter to Hollywood is necessarily a love-letter to movies (the tone is reminiscent of Cinema Paradiso). You know I love movies about movies. But it's more than that. Because Los Angeles is a unique city. He captures the spirit of a town full of dreamers. Briefly about the ending--I think it's perfect. It reminds us that the essence of the film is not simply their love for each other, but for their high hopes and dreams. The film, after all, is named for the city that will make or break you.

This review is going to get a lot longer than I intended but I'm going to keep going cause there's a lot of ground to cover.

The look: the colors are perhaps a little too obvious. And by that I mean, they pop so much that we're not used to such bold un-patterned primary color coordination. But I think that adds to the dreaminess of the film. The ten-minute balletic epilogue is just stunning. The cinematography is just stunning. Los Angeles has never looked so good. La La Land is not the first film to do the long takes, but it does it very impressively. Someone in the Crowd requires some fancy camera navigation and a well-placed mirror. The opening sequence was all filmed in one shot. I think we've entered a period (maybe starting a few years ago with Gravity) in which the expectation is for contemporary films to go big and do the long single takes. It is becoming normal. But that is not to underscore the massive achievement of getting it all at once perfectly.

Jazz: The soundtrack is phenomenal. I've been playing it on repeat nonstop. Also, looking at the lyrics more closely, they're appropriately fitting. Justin Hurwitz has two Oscars coming his way, for sure. I think jazz is very fitting for Los Angeles. LA is not a jazz town, but the music really captures that trying spirit. Everyone is a constant struggle to make it and what is jazz if not about improvising your own path. As Sebastian points out, it is conflict and compromise.

Acting: I saw Emma Stone in Cabaret on Broadway and she was great. She's not the best singer and neither is Ryan Gosling. But if they could sing, then they wouldn't be struggling artists. The whole point is that they are talented in their own right, but that's not always enough in LA. The parts don't call for excellent singers. They were correctly cast. The leading lady and man are our new Hollywood couple. They've acted together before and I imagine they will continue. They have the look. I love the scene when they're singing City of Stars together. Whereas some scenes look like the actors are singing to a track, this one is unequivocally live. You hear and see it in the imperfect tone and the quavers in their voices. It is vulnerable and human. And it pulls us down from dream world (or la la land). Ryan Gosling plays piano very convincingly. Even if he can only play those couple of pieces, that is pretty impressive. Emma Stone carries the film though. We may focus more on Sebastian's story line, but Emma Stone gives her character dimension and emotion more interesting than Gosling's. I do think John Legend was a weird choice; he's a little too smooth for jazz. I kept thinking Jamie Foxx would've been great.

So if you couldn't tell, I loved everything about this movie. To people that say they liked it but didn't love it, just look and hear and moreover feel how beautiful this movie is. Don't confuse it for a shallow musical. It is more complex than it may let on. 

Magic in the Moonlight (2014)

It is not Woody Allen's finest movie.  The premise is not entirely enticing.  Colin Firth plays a magician who is attempting to defraud Emma Stone as a mystic.  The story is kind of silly and I had a tough time investing in any of the main characters, though Hamish Linklater's rich yet lovelorn singer is kind of funny.  All the action, or lack of action, takes place in the majestic French Riviera as Allen continues to make non-New York films in his later years.  He also continues to make romantic comedies featuring upper class older men and younger women, perhaps a bit of art imitating life.  Colin Firth is a good actor, and he carries the movie.  Emma Stone retains her quirkiness in this role and her wide eyes are fitting for a psychic.  She will get another go at a Woody Allen film later this year. Hopefully she will have some better writing to work with.       

Birdman or (The Unexpected Virtue of Ignorance) (2014)

Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu composes a masterpiece in his innovative satire on show business.  The most impressive aspect of Birdman is the illusion of one smooth, massive continuous take.   This is a combination of excellent cinematography by Oscar-winner Emmanuel Lubezki and some visual effects tricks.  It emulates a stage play, much like the one being staged in the movie.  The way scenes change in the movie very much resemble a play as do the monologues. The setting inside one of Broadway's great theaters is a labyrinth that the crew must have navigated expertly to get its shots.  I always pay special attention to lighting in "plays",  which is done in the movie such that the light from one set doesn't pollute the others nearby despite the continuous take.

I love the life-imitates-art-imitates-life concept of the film, casting former Batman, Michael Keaton to play a version of himself, not an easy thing to do.  Keaton leads a superb cast.  They all deliver their quirky jokes in this dry, fast-paced way that keeps the movie flowing with the camera.  It is also moved along by the innovative score, made up solely of drum solos and classical interludes.  My favorite is the always good Edward Norton, who, in one scene, gives a masterclass in acting to Keaton.  Emma Stone also deserves to be singled out, playing a recovering drug addict.  All 3 actors are serious Oscar contenders.

Cabaret (Broadway) (1998/2014)

In the recent restaging of Sam Mendes's Tony-award winning production of Cabaret, Alan Cumming reprises his role as the emcee at the Kit Kat Klub.  Studio 54 is transformed into the seedy Berlin nightclub with tables and lamps throughout the audience. The atmosphere in the theater is unlike anything else on Broadway.  Gaudy light bulbs line the walls (and light up the room periodically).  The lighting work is excellent, with good use and execution of the spotlight and shadows(especially in the second act).  The first thing you notice when you walk into the room is the stage (which is kind of small for a Broadway stage) which is uncovered without a curtain.  The orchestra sits above the stage and every scene or so you see the musicians shuffle in and out of the pit as they're also part of the company.  The orchestra gets its own moments to shine, with a big solo in the second act, though no overture.

The story of Cabaret is very dark, taking place as the Nazis come to power in late-Weimar Germany.  There is no definitive beginning, middle, end to the plot.  Coming out of the play, I was not quite sure what exactly had happened--if you take out the subplot, not that much happens with the main love story.  Maybe my own fault, the progression of the story is not totally clear.  The ending, especially, is a little difficult to interpret.

I appreciate the excellence of Kander and Ebb.  The songs sung in the Cabaret are metaphors for what is occurring outside the club enhancing the plot.  Their music and lyrics are brilliant. And the very best song is the opening Willkommen.  It is an excellent introduction to the Kit Kat Klub and Alan Cumming has mastered the song after hundreds of performances.

Alan Cumming is devilishly good.  A very versatile actor, this is the role he was born to play. He's so seedy, edgy and dark.  He plays the emcee as an overly sexualized ringleader.  He dances and sings his heart out.  His costume and makeup are perfectly fitting for his character.  A Tony winner already for this role, you can tell that he really enjoys playing the emcee.  Tony nominees Danny Burstein and Linda Emond are both excellent.

I suspect that if Emma Stone originated her role, she too would have received a nomination.  Emma Stone is stunningly gorgeous as the iconic Sally Bowles.  Her singing is not the best, but Sally Bowles is not the best singer.  she believes herself to be very talented, but in actuality is mediocre.  Her first number, Don't Tell Mama, puts her off to a good start.  She really shines in the titular number.  In Cabaret, the audience hears and feels her devastating anguish.  She builds up to the climax at the coda and lets the emotion flow uninhibited.  It noticeably and appropriately affects her pitch.  Her rendition is strikingly different from Liza Minelli's recording.  It is more raw and I think that's what the song calls for.  Any shortcomings she might have had in the first act is made up for completely by Cabaret.  (I hope the new cast, now with Emma Stone, does a recording)

The Amazing Spiderman 2 (2014)

This movie unfortunately will face comparisons.  Marvel had an incredibly strong showing this year with Captain America, X-Men and now Guardians of the Galaxy.  Spiderman is the weak link.  On top of that, I do not think the sequel was as good as the first one.  There were some really great scenes.  The movie really emphasizes Spiderman's  super quick reflexes with slow motion scenes.  The effects are well done in those scenes.  That being said, they are not nearly as entertaining as Quicksilver's shining moment in X-Men.

Andrew Garfield and Emma Stone are excellent.  Spiderman, as a superhero, has always been kind of lame/goofy when it comes to dialogue.  But I think the dialogue throughout the movie was relatively weak (You don't have dim sum at 8, Emma Stone!).  The screenplay was a little all over the place.  I would have been satisfied with just Green Goblin or just Electro, but we unnecessarily get both.