The Woman in Gold (2015)

This movie is dramatization of a true story of Nazi art theft and the legal nightmare that Maria Altmann went through to recover the paintings that were stolen from her family.  These five Klimts include the iconic Portrait of Adele Bloch-Bauer I, which exemplifies Klimt's golden phase.  This movie combines two things that I like: legal drama and fine art, all set against the backdrop of the Holocaust.  Not only is the story fascinating, it is devastating. The movie is driven by themes of legal right versus cultural right. Klimt has come to be representative of Austrian culture, and his artworks are national treasures. Altmann hires a family friend to be her lawyer, an inexperienced Randol Schoenberg, the grandson of the famous Austrian composer Arnold Schoenberg. Altmann came from a wealthy Jewish family in Vienna that hosted the Austrian intellectuals of the day in a renowned salon.  Both characters are steeped in twentieth century Austrian culture, but their families were lain victim to the atrocities committed by Austrians complicit with the Nazis, yet the Austrian government has the audacity to suggest a cultural right to the paintings.

Helen Mirren is excellent as always as a woman torn between the rush of terrible memories Austria reminds her of and the pursuit of what is legally hers.  Tatiana Maslany convincingly plays a young Altmann, whose story is told in stylish black-and-white.  Ryan Reynolds plays the inexperienced lawyer and he comes across as kind of awkward, which is not necessarily a bad thing.      

The Giver (2014)

The movie is never quite as good as the book.  This movie never really captures the essence of the Newbery Medal winning book for which it is based. Lois Lowry creates a world of her own imagination, rich with detail.  This "perfect" world eliminates choice through a strict set of rules, creating a society of equality, sameness.  To start off, Jonas narrates the rules of the society.  But he does not explain to the audience what this society is about, only scratching the surface of the Lowry's creation. For those who have not read the book, they are thrown into this utopia/dystopia without the proper background.  Hollywood created a love story where there is none, not understanding that the people in the society are not capable of love.  Even the ending is slightly different (read: worse), not leaving room for audience interpretation.

The dialogue moves very quickly, with characters almost speaking over each other with little pause in between responses.  It comes off as almost robotic.  Maybe the director was going for flat to depict the lack of emotions, because even the incomparable Meryl Streep (whose role does not appear prominently in the book) and Jeff Bridges gives uninspired performances.

It is a very short film and the plot moves very quickly, so the audience is not given much time to digest anything.  But in that short time, there is some really beautiful cinematography.  The contrast of the black-and-white and the vibrant colors is stunning, and the flow of memories produce some incredible images.  In conclusion, read the book.